Dwarflab Dwarf 3

DWARFLAB DWARF 3

A dictionary-sized, budget-friendly all-rounder — dual-lens imaging with a surprisingly capable Sony Starvis 2 sensor.

The Dwarflab Dwarf 3 packs a 6-element apochromatic dual-camera lens group into a body about the size of a dictionary, weighing just 1.35 kg. Its 1/1.8" Sony IMX678 Starvis 2 telephoto sensor offers excellent quantum efficiency and low read noise for its price point, while a companion wide-angle lens handles panoramas and landscape astrophotography. With a 3° field of view, 60-second exposures, Equatorial Mount Mode, and switchable VIS/Astro/Dual-Band filters, the Dwarf 3 punches well above its ~$549 price — making it one of the most accessible serious smart telescopes on the market.

Specifications

ApertureTelephoto: 1/1.8" · Wide-angle: 1/2.8"
Focal LengthTelephoto: 150mm (737mm equiv.) · Wide-angle: 6.7mm (45mm equiv.)
SensorTelephoto: Sony IMX678 Starvis 2 (8.3MP) · Wide-angle: Sony IMX307 (2MP)
Field of ViewTelephoto: 3.38° diagonal · Wide-angle: 50.6° diagonal
Weight1.35 kg
FilterSwitchable VIS / Astro (IR-pass) / Dual-Band (OIII 500.7nm + Hα 656.3nm)
PowerUSB-C, supports external USB charging
ConnectivityWiFi & Bluetooth (up to 20m), NFC quick pairing
FeaturesBuilt-in 10,000mAh battery (~5.5h), 128GB storage, Equatorial Mount Mode, up to 60s exposures, mosaic mode, RTSP streaming

Pricing

New

~$549 USD

Used

Limited used market data (recent release)

Pros & Cons

✓ Pros

  • +Exceptional value — most affordable serious smart telescope in this lineup
  • +Sony IMX678 Starvis 2 sensor delivers excellent low-light sensitivity and low noise
  • +60-second exposures supported in Equatorial Mount Mode
  • +Dual-band, astro, and standard filters switchable directly on the device
  • +Very portable at 1.35 kg — comparable to the SeeStar S30 Pro
  • +Multiple export formats (JPG, PNG, FITS, TIFF) for serious post-processing
  • +NFC one-touch pairing speeds up setup
  • +IP54 dust/moisture resistance for outdoor use

✗ Cons

  • Smaller aperture limits reach on fainter, smaller deep-sky targets
  • Shorter battery life (~5.5h) than SeeStar competitors
  • Newer brand with a smaller community and less third-party support than ZWO
  • Not usable for planetary imaging — focal length too short
  • App and ecosystem less mature than ZWO's SeeStar app